Example report

This is a fictional archive and an illustrative report, not a measured model evaluation. Scores show the kind of output to expect.

The archive

old-work/
  garden-sensor/
    design-notes.md
    enclosure.stl
  backup/garden-sensor/
    design-notes.md
    enclosure.stl
  workshop-organizer/
    sketches.md
    prototype-notes.txt
  tutorials/
    starter-project/

The owner's profile values original designs and unfinished tools, and lists Garden sensor as a known project.

A review queue

Score	Action	Folder	Why
94	review	/garden-sensor	Design notes and a model suggest an original hardware prototype.
86	review	/workshop-organizer	Substantial prototype notes may belong to an unfamiliar personal project.
83	review	/backup/garden-sensor	A possible copy worth comparing before choosing a source.
18	skim	/tutorials	Appears to be learning material; check for original modifications.

The unknown workshop-organizer project could also appear in novel.md. The duplicate report would group the two garden-sensor folders if their relative filenames and sizes match. Both remain in the review queue: that metadata does not establish that their contents are equal.

Follow the evidence

Read the source notes, inspect the STL, compare candidate copies, and decide which material belongs in your preservation workflow. ArchiveTuna supplies leads and context. It does not choose a canonical copy or move/delete files.

For actual results, begin with your first inventory.